[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)

Why don’t you wish to talk to the Policy Development Officer?



--
Kind regards,
Sergey Myasoedov


> On 11 Nov 2015, at 19:55, Aleksey Bulgakov <aleksbulgakov at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello.
> 
> Who can send the docs for new proposal creation?
> 
> 10 нояб. 2015 г. 17:00 пользователь "Saku Ytti" <saku at ytti.fi> написал:
> On 10 November 2015 at 14:37, Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Problem is the extremely low number of 16b ASN in the pool of every RIR.
> > Although RIPE NCC has a quarantine policy (if am not mistaken) with 000+ ASN
> > in it (NCC can confirm). Strict assignment policy would be great but BGP
> > Communities can be simple justification to get 16b ASN and bypass any
> > hurdles isn't it?
> 
> I would expect that anyone who gets 16b ASN transits some downstream.
> Otherwise it's hard to argue you need globally visible BGP
> communities.
> 
> --
>   ++ytti
>