[address-policy-wg] 2015-05

Dear colleagues,

I am not supporting this policy.
I write this email since I wrote on 20/10 that I like the policy text 
but I want that my thought about this policy is clear.

It does not contain any /something limit (as example /20) already 
administered by the requesting LIR.
I would add some text as follows:
[...]
3. The LIR has not reached an address space equivalent to /20 in its 
registry
[...]

For the ones asking theirself if I think there is any difference between 
LIR and LIR someone already asked me this. Yes I think there is.
I tought that the /8 policy was designed for new entrants and I can't 
see any new entrant owning a /21 or /20 or /19 or /16
To me looks slightly differente one old LIR to a new entrant LIR. So 
that's why different policies, different evaluation criterias and 
available recources.

regards
Riccardo
-- 

Riccardo Gori
e-mail: rgori at wirem.net


WIREM Fiber Revolution - Net-IT s.r.l.
Via Emilia Ponente, 1667
47522 Cesena (FC)
Tel +39 0547 1955485
Fax +39 0547 1950285
e-mail: info at wirem.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------
	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re-
plying to info at wirem.net
         Thank you
WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l. via Emilia Ponente, 1667 - 47522 Cesena (FC)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151102/6112feb6/attachment.html>