[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Mathew Newton <
Mathew.Newton643 at official.mod.uk> wrote:

(..., yes, I read it all)

Even though I may have been vague with the numbers and specifics, does it
> help shed any light on how we might struggle to fit into a /29 allocation?
> In many respects, for us I feel that the fact there are >500k /48's in a
> /29 is similar to the fact that a /64 subnet has 2^64 addresses within it -
> it doesn't necessarily mean what the figures might otherwise first suggest!
>

This makes me curious.

Your /29 is the equivalent of 8 IPv4 internets, if we ignore that /64
subnet thing.

How do you manage your IPv4 space, then? Do you actually have routing that
needs more than 8 total IPv4 spaces?

-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150512/2a52ff7d/attachment.html>