[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:47:55PM +0200, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote:
>On 11/05/15 19:00, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
>if I understand correctly, you are opposing to the RIPE NCC's planned 
>implementation of this proposal (under the terms and understanding of 
>this Impact Analysis), is that correct?

Yep, since I can't oppose the implementation plan separately, I
have to consider it part of the proposal for PDP purposes.

>What If once the policy proposal would become policy and would be 
>implemented, _all all allocations made after the implementation date_ 
>will need to have a 2 years 'buffer' - would that be acceptable?

Yes, I'm not opposed to the "meat" of the proposal (now that it
is clear that M&A are not affected), just to the retroactive
implementation.

rgds,
Sascha Luck