[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

On Mon, May 11, 2015, at 19:00, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
> Why, a policy could be enacted that retroactively invalidates
> allocation/assignment criteria, resulting in LIRs having to

It is not retroactive, and it does not change the allocation criteria.
It only changes transfer rules, and my understanding is that it will
only apply from the moment it becomes policy (at best, more realistic is
the time NCC is ready to implement, which may be some days/weeks later).

What you say is suggesting the fact that obtaining an allocation for the
sole purpose of transfer is acceptable behaviour, and I suppose most
people here don't agree with that.