This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
mtl at netassist.ua
Tue May 5 16:04:12 CEST 2015
Yes, that's the price of *clean* IPv4 /22 on the market, without any trackable criminal history. Yes, spammers *can* register a new LIR for /22. And I believe they (or somebody for them) *do* that. No, people buy clean /22 *not* only for sendind spam. Good business want good IPs and wish to pay some money for that. BUT, some good companies don't want/can't start-up a horde of LIRs using a horde of shell companies, and one /22 is as small as not visible for them. They need /16 for example, and wish to pay some money for just buying a network. The price I know is from $6 to $15 per IP. That's the source of that hoarding /22 business. If you want to eliminate it really - the only real way is to kill a profit. On 04.05.15 14:50, Tomasz SLASKI wrote: > $10k for /22 is the speculative price of 'virgin space' offered for > spammers, who buy /22 and then burn it out on every blacklist in the > World, making the addresses practically unusable for long time. Who > havinghealthy brain is buying /22 for $10k, for 'normal' purposes, if he > can buy with no questions /22 by just opening a new LIR?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]