This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] aggregating unused allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] aggregating unused allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] aggregating unused allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Thu Mar 19 11:51:12 CET 2015
Hi Antonis - On 19.03.2015 09:54, Antonis Lioumis wrote: > Recently my company got a /22 allocation through the well known transfer > procedure between LIR's. > In the past we also got the /22 we qualify from RIPE NCC's last /8. This > /22 was put aside for future use. > For aggregation purposes we asked RIPE NCC to return both /22 and get > back a /21 but according to current policies this is forbidden. > Since global routing table has exceeded 500000 prefixes and expected to > grow more maybe RIPE community should rethink permitting the exchange of > smaller IPv4 blocks with contiguous one. how about sending text for a policy (change) in this respect? :-) Cheers, Carsten
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] aggregating unused allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] aggregating unused allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]