[address-policy-wg] APNIC temporarily freezing v4 transfers to RIPE NCC?

On Mar 10, 2015, at 11:36 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote:

> thanks to Tore for pointing this out, but page 6 of:
> 
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.apnic.net_-5F-5Fdata_assets_pdf-5Ffile_0011_80786_apnic-2Dec-2Dminutes-2D20141126.pdf&d=AwIFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=XDN_BIPGnpb6V0w5M9FADw&m=qREGu1kpzJCBMNBo8Rla_1KJXMuy8S5K-jNZnq6vnr0&s=9FMPKbELj5vBOjS9qlYVT1DANtfXa4ne68ofKVS_fD4&e= 
> 
> contains the following:
> 
>> 21. Inter-RIR transfer policy discussion
>> 
>> The EC considered the Inter-RIR transfer policy discussions (attached).
>> 
>> The EC unanimously resolved to place a temporary moratorium on inter RIR
>> transfer with RIPE NCC, pending discussions and confirmation with APNIC,
>> ARIN and RIPE communities that such transfers will not change APNIC’s
>> status as sharing reciprocal, compatible, needs-based policy with ARIN.
>> 
>> Motion proposed by Paul Wilson, seconded by Akinori Maemura.
> 
> Could someone from APNIC, ARIN or both explain the background to this
> decision?  I haven't seen any discussions in the RIPE community about this,
> and without knowing the background it seems peculiar that APNIC feels it
> necessary to consult ARIN about APNIC->RIPE NCC resource transfers.
> 
> Nick
> 
> 

+1, does this also include transfers to CNNIC? The ARIN->RIPE direction seems like an odd one to be concerned about.

Best,

-M<




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150310/6c52cbe1/attachment.sig>