This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Garry Glendown
garry at nethinks.com
Tue Jun 30 08:57:33 CEST 2015
> Am 29.06.15 um 23:52 schrieb Petr Umelov: >> In 2 years the second block can be in black list and it is better to >> receive it earlier > Hi, > > now that was a Freudian slip that gives us a hint what the underlying > business model really is. > > If ISPs burn through networks in a rate that puts whole /22s on > blacklists within two years' time, they should think about the reasons > instead of crying wolf. > > Why should RIPE, RIPE NCC, the community as a whole or anyone else help > those people run a parasitic business model? I was already wondering about that, too ... ;) Looks like 2015-1 has more benefits than we originally thought ;) -garry
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]