[address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:42:20PM +0300, Manager wrote:
> It's better to make ipv4 easy to get. Lets say give new lir /21 but not /22. 

This can be done, but is outside the scope of *this* proposal (and people
are discussing it, so you might see something along that lines, or not) -
so that discussion will not be interesting regarding the Last Call status
of 2015-01.

(As a side note, just speaking up and claiming "I am against the proposal"
without even pointing out against *which* proposal is a bit ridiculous - we
currently have 4 open proposals in the machinery.  Of course we all know 
which proposal you're all against, since we've had the arguments before,
but still, a bit of mailing list etiquette would be nice)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150629/422a3537/attachment.sig>