[address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers

Hello!

Why not to write down and weigh all the arguments for and against the proposal?

29.06.2015, 22:44, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>:
>  Hi,
>
>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:34:32PM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote:
>>   Hi.<br /><br />The RIPE NCC receives /9 from IANA every 6 months
>
>  It does not.
>
>  And please, arguments like "this will not stop abuse", "this is not
>  going far enough", "we have enough addresses" and "it's my good right
>  to make money out of the last-/8 policy and so do not call it abuse!!"
>  have been heard and duly considered.
>
>  If you can come up with a NEW argument that can be reasonably backed
>  by factual arguments, we're all ears.
>
>  Repeating what was already repeated often enough in discussion and review
>  phase will only annoy people into ignoring you.
>
>  Gert Doering
>          -- APWG chair
>  --
>  have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
>  SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
>  Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
>  D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
>  Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279


-- 
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503