[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy

Hello!

Why wouldn't they become a LIR?

19.06.2015, 15:03, "Thomas Drewermann" <thomas at freifunk-rheinland.net>:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> we recently requested an IPv6 assingment on behalf of one Freifunk
> Community in germany.
> They wanted to be indipendent from us and to take routing decisions on
> their own.
> As they are a freifunk community some of the PI assigment would be used
> to lease addresses to clients/users.
> According to NCC the policy currently doesn't permit usage of PI space.
>
> Small Hotspot providers and especially Freifunk communities typically
> can not afford a LIR Membership to be independent. In my opinion the
> current policy makes it hard to adopt IPv6 in such cases.
>
> I'd like to propose a change of the policy to allow PI addresses to be
> used for clients which don't belong the assigment-holder. This clients
> are connecting to networks which use address space of the holders PI
> assignment e.g. via wifi.
>
> The difference between an assignment is that there is a single address
> provided to walk in wifi users rather than a whole subnet delegated for
> usage by the connecting client/user/customer.
>
> How do you think about that situation?
> What would be your thoughts on such a proposal?
>
> Regards
> Thomas Drewermann
> Freifunk Rheinland e.V.

-- 
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503