This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Complaint and future of the APWG.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Complaint and future of the APWG.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Complaint and future of the APWG.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
Fri Jun 12 10:25:12 CEST 2015
Hi randy: I have read this, and I also know I might not as experience as you. Let me put it again: Chair can not declare consensus if there are still Many people disagree.(real or fake that's another topic). But we need to find ways to close the loop, just I didn't see this PDP process will likely to pass. 在 2015年6月12日，上午10:15，Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> 写道： >> > > i do not believe this is correct. you may find help in understanding > the, admittedly culturally based, meaning of consensus in RFC 7282, > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7282 > > randy > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Complaint and future of the APWG.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Complaint and future of the APWG.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]