[address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Marius Catrangiu
<catrangiumarius at gmail.com> wrote:
> This method, i think, is very near to discrimination if not backed up with
> something concrete.
> And for the RIPE NCC is a lot of work to detect witch new LIR has possible
> connections with all existing LIRS.
> Can you think of a method that could do this detection automaticaly ?

I'm okay with letting RIPE NCC use some judgment. I am unsure if they
are (RIPE NCC).
And sooner or later someone will complain. How, and who should deal
with that? I think the current complain system can handle it with some
minor tuning.


There are other options, some a bit far out there, but either way here
we go (oh, and I don't think APGW is the right place for this
discussion).


We could turn the table around, show that you got IPv6 deployed as a
requirement.
Or we could request that new LIR show that they actual are doing
business as in showing an approved accounting from last year (not sure
if I use the right words here...), point is that they should show they
actual are doing business before they can get IPv4.
This will however actual exclude them from interacting with any IPv4
marked for a while, but, really, I don't care much about that problem.
Consider that iOS requirement Apple just announced and we it's a short
term problem.... another way around that problem is to buy/lease IPv4
until they can get their from RIPE NCC.



-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no