This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Thu Jun 11 11:29:15 CEST 2015
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 01:59:26PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: >However if that ever happens, it means the other 11,990 NCC >members were either indifferent to the policy proposal or felt >it didn't have enough impact to take ANY action while the >proposal was passing through the PDP. This is the equivalent of >someone complaining about who got to be in government when they >didn't bother to go out and vote. Alas, this is only too true and I don't know why this is so. I might propose an NCC activity to raise awareness of the PDP among the membership as a first step - if I can figure out how to go about that. Another thing that may help is to move away from mailing lists as the sole tool - email is something that only old farts like myself are really comfortable with, not to mention very open to abuse as we've seen. There are more modern collaboration tools available, something like Etherpad maybe... rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]