[address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 01:59:26PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote:
>However if that ever happens, it means the other 11,990 NCC
>members were either indifferent to the policy proposal or felt
>it didn't have enough impact to take ANY action while the
>proposal was passing through the PDP. This is the equivalent of
>someone complaining about who got to be in government when they
>didn't bother to go out and vote.

Alas, this is only too true and I don't know why this is so. I
might propose an NCC activity to raise awareness of the PDP among the
membership as a first step - if I can figure out how to go about that.

Another thing that may help is to move away from mailing lists as
the sole tool - email is something that only old farts like
myself are really comfortable with, not to mention very open to
abuse as we've seen. There are more modern collaboration tools
available, something like Etherpad maybe...

rgds,
Sascha Luck