This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jun 10 14:53:54 CEST 2015
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:43:23PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> However, you can of course come up with a proposal, based on your own
> criticism of how these processes are. I don't quite see how that is on
> topic for the address policy working group, though, as it's not an address
> policy, but a meta policy which has ramifications far beyond this working
> group.
Right, a change to the PDP would have go through consensus on the ripe-list
as it affects the whole community and all the WGs (though AP is certainly
the WG that excercises the PDP most).
... and the RIPE chair would have to judge consensus on this.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150610/795aa4d2/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE != RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]