[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published

Hi Gert,

You say it will not solve all other potential problems that exist or might
exist and I agree with you here, but to me it cannot also solve the existing
and known problem too. 

"making less attractive"  is not also a good argument to support it,

Regards,

Arash Naderpour



-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at space.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 1:09 PM
To: Arash Naderpour
Cc: 'Gert Doering'; address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis
Published

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:21:49AM +0430, Arash Naderpour wrote:
> "This policy proposal will not prevent organisations from setting up 
> one or more LIRs and hoarding the /22s. It will only add a two-year 
> restriction before a /22 from the last /8 can be transferred."

It does what it intends to do, and that is, make fast-trading (open LIR, get
/22, sell of, close LIR) less attractive.

It will not solve all other potential problems that exist or might exist, so
"it does not go far enough" is not a good argument to oppose what might
achieved in this first step - of course, a second step can always follow.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279