This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ciprian Nica
office at ip-broker.uk
Tue Jun 9 22:45:37 CEST 2015
> Another opinion/impression that i have (and this does not affect only RIPE > region) is that big providers and content providers do not want ipv6 to be > implemented because behind thoese guys are big interests of making profits > over the ipv4 exaution and this happened as you saw in Romania (Jump > Management) too. Romania was for a while the #1 in the world at IPv6 deployment and even though you didn't take part in the IPv6 deployment at that time, you know very well how everything went. Obviously there are interests of making profit over IPv4 extinction but nobody from Romania would have been able to influence that. Ciprian
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]