[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:07:59PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
> > With the limited amount of data available (since this effect only started
> > over the last year or so), you can fit about every curve you like into
> > it - exponential, linear, quadratic. None will be a very reasonable
> > projection.
> 
> So we can't say exactly "there are progressive IPv4 exhaustion" and we have nothing to worry about right now. Yes?

We see behaviour that is unwanted, and is violating the expressed spirit
of the last /8 policy.

And your own numbers nicely demonstrated that this is growing quite fast.

So, thanks for making the point that this policy is indeed necessary.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150609/5671c583/attachment.sig>