[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

And this is the final argument that this policy has no positive effect.

It will not prevent the current practice as the 2 top traders of last /8
IPs know how to work around it and now probably even more will know that
too.

Come up with a proposal that will really stop this kind of activity and
I'll fully support it.

In my opinion all the discussions regarding this policy only helped
abusers learn how to abuse more and opened the eyes to others on how to
abuse, so not that the policy is useless but it's proposal was a mistake.

Ciprian Nica
IP Broker Limited


On 6/9/2015 7:43 PM, Petr Umelov wrote:
> *Attention
> 
> 09.06.2015, 19:33, "Ciprian Nica" <office at ip-broker.uk>:
>> On 6/9/2015 7:19 PM, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
>>>>  help the last /8 pool become even larger
>>>
>>>  It's not true. There is still possibility to open multiple LIR's for the same person (legal or natural, no matter) and then merge them all together.
>>>
>>>  So this proposal (by itself) is not able to prevent /8 exhaustion
>>