This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vladimir Andreev
vladimir at quick-soft.net
Tue Jun 9 18:04:23 CEST 2015
Hi! Here: +---------+------+ | month | /22s | +---------+------+ | 2013-01 | 1 | | 2013-05 | 1 | | 2013-07 | 3 | | 2013-10 | 1 | | 2013-12 | 1 | | 2014-01 | 5 | | 2014-02 | 9 | | 2014-03 | 3 | | 2014-04 | 2 | | 2014-05 | 6 | | 2014-06 | 7 | | 2014-07 | 6 | | 2014-08 | 6 | | 2014-09 | 15 | | 2014-10 | 15 | | 2014-11 | 17 | | 2014-12 | 38 | | 2015-01 | 21 | | 2015-02 | 19 | | 2015-03 | 25 | | 2015-04 | 39 | | 2015-05 | 19 | | 2015-06 | 9 | +---------+------+ I see only single growth of transfers starting 09.2014. After that time transfer count is just oscillating up and down. 09.06.2015, 18:58, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 06:51:01PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote: >> > The reason for this policy is to make sure that the community keeps to >> > the *intent* of the "last /8" policy: ensure that newcomers in the market >> > will have a bit of IPv4 space available to number their translation gear >> > to and from IPv6. It will not completely achieve that, of course, but >> > make the obvious loophole less attractive. >> >> Earlier I already said that fast-trade takes away only 3% of last /8. >> >> Today Ciprian Nica showed that there is NO exponential grow of transfers from last /8 and also calculated that transferred IP's from last /8 represent only 1.83% of all transferred IP's. >> >> So what is this proposal about? > > The growth in trade is VERY clearly visible. > > With the limited amount of data available (since this effect only started > over the last year or so), you can fit about every curve you like into > it - exponential, linear, quadratic. None will be a very reasonable > projection. > > But it's actually good that only 3% of the last /8 has been fast-traded > away: let's keep it that way. > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]