[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:22:43PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> I expect the answer to be no, and for good reason. Yet, could chairs
> comment on if there is a way to exclude people from participating on
> this and other RIPE mailing lists?

Only on very exceptional circumstances.  Like, sustained personal attacks
and not stopping when the chair calls to order.

In general, a consensus based process living on an *open and publically
archived mailing list* needs to be open to all interested parties - but
at the same time, I think the openness works in our favour, as in many
cases, people's actions very much speak for themselves...

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150609/3ca082f0/attachment.sig>