[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

Guten Tag,
> I opposite this proposal.
>
> It only will increase the price of the block, RIPE won't be get
> payment from this scheme and will increase the price of membership
I don't see why this proposal causes a price increase for legitimate
LIRs that plan on operating instead of just existing for the cause of
receiving a /22 then transfer to another LIR ...

Personally, I believe the proposal (or a later extension of the policy)
should also limit the intake of /22 from the last /8 on the receiving
end - while I do understand that for any late entry into the Internet
market the limitation of getting around with just one /22 is causing a
certain degree of hardship, it's still something that should not be
relieved just by throwing money at it, while new companies with even
later entry into the market end up without any v4 addresses at all due
to hoarders ... so limiting transfer-in to something like 3x /22 over
the period of 5 years (for example) could make it even more expensive
(albeit, again, would not completely rule out hoarding)

Anyway, as a first step, I support 2015-01 ...

Regards, Garry

--

Garry Glendown * Professional Services & Solutions

NETHINKS GmbH | Bahnhofstraße 16 | 36037 Fulda
T +49 661 25 000 0 | F +49 661 25 000 49 | garry.glendown at nethinks.com
Geschäftsführer: Uwe Bergmann
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Garry Glendown | AG Fulda HRB 2546
PGP Fingerprint: B1CF 4952 F6EB E060 8A10 B957 700E F97F B412 DD32