This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] -1 for 2015-1
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] -1 for 2015-1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] policy 2015-1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Jun 9 11:00:08 CEST 2015
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:16:23AM +0430, ?????????? ?????????????? wrote:
> policy 2015-1 not good and me -1 for policy
Please explain the reasoning behind. Otherwise it is hard for us to
address your concerns.
"It does not go far enough" is something I'll not consider a viable objection
on the last day of the review phase - as "going further" can always be
addressed in another protocol, afterwards or even in parallel.
"It will break my business of opening LIRs and selling off /22s quickly"
is also not considered something that will hold up the proposal, as this
is the whole point of it.
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150609/d2dac8c0/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] -1 for 2015-1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] policy 2015-1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]