This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Garry Glendown
garry at nethinks.com
Mon Jul 27 18:34:00 CEST 2015
> But everybody here just understood that nobody listen to them. > Yes. It's good idea to submit new policy canceling this one policy or > making it better! But if nobody listen to members why to do so? Democracy sucks sometimes... unfortunately, most participants in the list weighed the arguments and were in support of the policy change - and considering the wailing done by several people who make money by trading IPs, it may be a first successful step towards abuse of the policies for IP address transfer ... I reckon we can get the additional loopholes fixed in the next proposal - and I doubt they will turn out to reverse the change ... -garry
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]