This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented?(Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Sun Jul 26 14:34:31 CEST 2015
On 25/07/2015 17:14, ripe at europeiptv.net wrote: > Hello, I do not see that the political right have retroactive effect, is > not very democratic change the rules of what was received with other > policies, but if I see the correct application of this policy to > allocations received after this announcement, how do you see? if you are going to make this argument, you will also need to accept that IPv4 transfers are not applicable to ipv4 allocations made before 2009 because the ipv4 transfer policy (2007-08) was only implemented in 2009. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented?(Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]