This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size) - “subsequent allocations”
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size) - “subsequent allocations”
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Thu Jul 23 11:43:34 CEST 2015
Hello Annette, > the LIR-team of de.government supports this current policy proposal “2015-03 New Draft Document”. +1 > > In addition we also made up our mind about the resulting inconsistency to the criteria for subsequent allocations. Therefore we plan to propose a “follow-up” proposal which tries to align the subsequent allocation criteria in case of a successful 2015-03 PDP. Ok, we'll see how 2015-03 goes and contact you once that has been concluded (either withdrawn or accepted). If you have any questions feel free to contact the chairs and RIPE NCC PDO at apwg-chairs at ripe.net, or to follow up on this list of course. Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size) - “subsequent allocations”
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Proposal Accepted and Implemented (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]