[address-policy-wg] Final consensus on 2015-01: Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

22.07.2015, 15:14, "Sander Steffann" <sander at steffann.nl>:
>  Hello working group,
>
>  Shahin Gharghi, Petr Umelov and Yuri at Ip4market argued that this proposal doesn't solve all problems. This has already been discussed and acknowledged during the review phase. No policy proposal will ever solve everything all at once. People wanting additional changes are encouraged to submit new policy proposals to address any remaining issues.

If it wouldn't solve the problems - this would be okay and we could start new proposal, described this unresolved problems.

But this proposal will increase multiple LIR accounts creation and the number of IPv4 will be decrease. Why don't you understand it?

>  Petr Umelov was under the impression that RIPE NCC receives a fixed size IPv4 block from IANA every 6 months, which is not correct as pointed out by Leo Vegoda. 

But the RIPE NCC receives a fixed size. But you don't consider it.


>
>  Sincerely,
>  Sander Steffann
>  APWG co-chair


-- 
Kind regards,
Petr Umelov