This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Jul 14 01:18:40 CEST 2015
Hi André, > On 09.07.2015 14:19, Marco Schmidt wrote: >> We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments >> to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 7 August 2015. > > tl;dr: I support the proposal in the current state. > > I do not really think this will help the routing table growth as > outlined in section B of the impact analysis though. The organisations > that are likely to request address space under the proposed rules will > probably announce the received address space with some sort of > de-aggregation. > > But I do think this proposal can remove constraints some organisation > currently have when deploying (or trying to deploy) IPv6. I have already been thinking about the de-aggregation, and especially for national networks I think there are ways to keep that under control. But that's not really address policy related. I'll take it to our Routing WG. Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]