This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Petr Umelov
petr at fast-telecom.net
Sun Jul 12 19:12:23 CEST 2015
What do you mean cheap talk? One company can not setup more than one account. Is it enough for you? But when you will understand it, it will be too late. Or the RIPE NCC wants to deplete IPv4 purposely to help to switch to IPv6. I don't see any reasons of this proposal creation. Here are people who can calculate all part of the transfers. But they are lazy and trust for WG. 12.07.2015, 19:55, "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com>: > please submit the first draft of your proposal. then folk can judge if > it is useful to delay 2015-01. otherwise it's just cheap talk. > > randy -- Kind regards, Petr Umelov
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]