This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-02 Last Call for Comments (Keep IPv6 PI When Requesting IPv6 Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-02 end of review phase / consensus reached (Keep IPv6 PI When Requesting IPv6 Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Schmidt
mschmidt at ripe.net
Wed Jul 8 11:10:56 CEST 2015
Dear colleagues,
The proposal described in 2015-02, "Keep IPv6 PI When Requesting IPv6 Allocation",
is now in its Concluding Phase.
The Address Policy Working Group co-Chairs have declared that consensus for
the proposal has been reached and it will now move to Last Call.
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of these
coming four weeks of Last Call is to give the community the opportunity
to present well-justified objections in case anyone missed the previous
two phases and want to oppose the proposal.
Any objection must be made by 6 August 2015 and must be supported by an
explanation.
If no substantive objections are raised by the end of Last Call, the
proposal will complete the PDP.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-02
Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to address-policy-wg at ripe.net
before 6 August 2015.
Regards,
Marco Schmidt
Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-02 end of review phase / consensus reached (Keep IPv6 PI When Requesting IPv6 Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]