[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015, at 07:23, Arash Naderpour wrote:
> My argument was not about "dummy-LIRs set up", I'm talking about the LIRs
> that are not new and are already registered years ago, (before RIPE NCC
> starts distribution of last /8, before 2012) now if they apply to receive
> their last /22 why they have to wait for 2 years to be able to transfer
> them to others. (that makes IP distribution more difficult)

If by "distributing to others" you mean to customers, nothing stops you
from doing that.
If by "distributing to others" you mean "transfer" (generally the
permanent transfer, which must pass RIPE NCC approval), yes, it does
stop you from doing that, and that's the whole point.

>  It was not mandatory to receive last /22 and they are plenty of LIRs  that
> are still using their existing allocations without getting their last /22.

No impact for them. They are not "obliged" to get their "last /22".

> Not every olds LIR received its /22 till now and this 2015-01 can affect them too. 
> Is it something supposed to be happened? I oppose this proposal
> because it has unnecessary effect on some of the genuine LIRs too.

Please explain.