[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01

I'm NOT speaking about my business now and you see it.

I'm speaking about current proposal discussion and ask you why were not some really IMPORTANT facts taken into consideration?

And I tell personally you again: I just want opinion of all parties involved into discussion would considered equally.

P.S. Block me if you want. It's THE last method then someone have no more arguments and can't solve a problem in a normal way.

01.07.2015, 11:55, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:42:39AM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
>>  P.S. You can block anybody in this list if you don't like the true. I think it's completely clear to all people what is happening here.
>
> Indeed. A few individuals try to stop the proposal by sabotaging the
> mailing list and our consensus-based process.
>
> And it is VERY clear who the individuals are, that they obviously stand
> to loose some business, and we all understand that you do not like that
> (but the purpose of the policy proposal *is* to make that business less
> lucrative, so, yes, we officially do not care for your business).
>
> As the chairs cannot let individuals destroy this list, moderation will
> happen if you just go on and on and on. We have received enough complaints
> about the noise level already.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

-- 
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503