[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01

hi,

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 12:04:59PM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
> Whatever we say, you made the decision, and our opinion does not matter.
> Right?
> 
> If anybody supports this proposal *and write +1* his voice will be
> counted, if don't he should write many arguments.
> 
> May be someone doesn't like this text but this is the trooth.

Please read up how the policy development process in the RIPE region works.

We're in Last Call now, which means "any arguments that have been brought
up and addressed in discussion and review phase are no longer interesting"
(because we consider them to be addressed, and per Sander's summary, have
reached rough consensus even if not everybody agrees).

The Last Call phase is specifically there to bring up *new* arguments
that have been overlooked before.  

Whether *I* agree with you or anyone else has nothing to do with how the
PDP works - if the argument is not new, it is not interesting, and just
noise on the list.  If people insist on creating noise, they will be 
quietened.

(Note that I'm also totally not interested in "support!" statements in
this phase)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150701/1cf06ad7/attachment.sig>