This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Call to Order (was: Opposing policy 2015-01)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Garry Glendown
garry at nethinks.com
Wed Jul 1 08:04:02 CEST 2015
On 01.07.2015 07:38, Shahin Gharghi wrote: > Hi > > I agree with Arash and also people can transfer their IP's after two > years. So the proposal doesn't help again. > > So, in essence, you would rather do NOTHING than accept the proposal, which at least - at the moment - significantly increases cost for IP-traders, while at the same time giving us additional time to come up with a better solution (which probably takes another year to come up with, discuss, optimize, and pass)? Why don't you enlighten us how you would improve 2015-1 in order to prevent abuse of the current policy? If you have any good ideas, I believe all of the people on the list would appreciate any constructive input? -garry
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Call to Order (was: Opposing policy 2015-01)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]