This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Thu Jan 22 23:03:51 CET 2015
Hi Nigel, > 1. The Board can propose a Charging Scheme in advance of the May GM and > have the membership discuss the proposal. The Board would take the > discussion into account before proposing a final Charging Scheme to be > voted on by the membership in May. I would go for this option. Let's discuss what we (the members) want and let the board make the final proposal that we then vote on. If we are going to vote on individual issues the result might be an inconsistent charging scheme and it would prevent members from suggesting something that doesn't fit in the list of issues that are voted upon. I think having an open discussion and then trusting the board to come up with a good proposal will produce better results. Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]