[address-policy-wg] Comments on proposal 2014-04 (Remove the IPv6 Requirement for receiving address space)

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:55:59PM +0200, Marius Catrangiu wrote:
> I totally agree with Stefan and I support what he said here. ipv6 should be
> a must.

Please understand what "Last Call" is about: *new* arguments that have
not be heard in the review or discussion phase, and have not been answered.

It is not useful to re-run the same arguments in circles after it has 
become clear that there is rough consensus the other way (and also
remember: rough consensus does not mean "everybody agrees").

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150122/b9da92c2/attachment.sig>