This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Comments on proposal 2014-04 (Remove the IPv6 Requirement for receiving address space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on proposal 2014-04 (Remove the IPv6 Requirement for receiving address space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on proposal 2014-04 (Remove the IPv6 Requirement for receiving address space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT)
d.baeza at tvt-datos.es
Thu Jan 22 18:20:41 CET 2015
Hi Dave, El 22/01/2015 a las 18:15, Dave Wilson escribió: > Note that "arguments supporting the proposal" says that the status quo > is actively troublesome for users of IPv6 PI space: to get a /22, they > have to disrupt their IPv6 installation to return their PI assignment > and get a PA allocation. This can be solved just modifiyin the IPv6 Requirement, not removing it. Just allowing PI assignments valid for recieving an allocation from the last /8. Easy as that. No troublesome for LIRs with PI assignments and to the ones that dont have any v6 PI/PA Space still in the need to request first for an IPv6. By this way, all happy. Cheers, -- Daniel Baeza
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on proposal 2014-04 (Remove the IPv6 Requirement for receiving address space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on proposal 2014-04 (Remove the IPv6 Requirement for receiving address space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]