This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Daniel Velea
elvis at velea.eu
Tue Jan 20 10:22:30 CET 2015
On 20/01/15 08:08, Tore Anderson wrote: > * "Marco Schmidt" <mschmidt at ripe.net> > >> The proposal described in 2014-12, "Allow IPv6 Transfers", is now in >> its Review Phase. > The need for IPv6 tranfers are probably going to be miniscule as IPv6 > numbers are readily available from the NCC, but nevertheless I think it > makes sense to harmonise the transfer policies for all the different > resource types we have. > > In some corner cases a transfer could prevent the need to renumber > (parts of) a network though. It's worth having this just to support > folks in that position. > > +1 > > Tore > I also support it, it's a good idea to have a policy that allows the transfer of all kinds of resources. /elvis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]