This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Tue Jan 20 00:59:51 CET 2015
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 01:45:58PM -0800, Sander Steffann wrote: >I'm not sure we should create another garbage collection >mechanism. I would prefer the NCC to implement the [2007-01] one No thanks. The same heap of bureaucratic bullshit that is required to get PI space just to get an *ASN*? Not to mention the lulz that will result when a LIR applies for an ASN and the NCC refuses the request because the same entity can't be on both sides of the contract... Garbage collection can be more easily implemented, just request (annual?) confirmation the resource is still required, if the answer is negative, or there is none, reclaim it. (This could even be extended to PIv6) Also, what did I miss? When did ASNs become such a scarce resource that drastic rationing is required? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]