This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon Jan 19 23:01:50 CET 2015
Hi Nick, > Op 19 jan. 2015 om 13:45 heeft Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> het volgende geschreven: > >> On 19/01/2015 21:42, Sander Steffann wrote: >> As a working group we need to decide a few things: >> - do we want to make it easy to get ASNs? (the answer seems to be "yes") >> - do we want to place a limit? >> - do we want a time-based or absolute limit? >> - do we wait for the next RIPE NCC charging scheme to see if that solves our problems? > > and: > > - do we want to implement garbage collection for unused assignments. Indeed! Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]