This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Fri Feb 20 21:22:16 CET 2015
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 08:43:33PM +0100, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote: >>At the current burn-rate, 8 years. >Want to bet it's going to be more than 10? I would even dare to say 15 >at a normal pace. >But only if this policy proposal does not get approved and the type of >speculation this policy proposal tries to prevent doesn't speed up >even more than it has in the few months since RIPE69. Another 15 years of this would be a pretty damn bleak prospect if you ask me. For the good of the Internet, let ipv4 run (really) out as quickly as possible. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]