This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Millnert
millnert at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 19:26:45 CET 2015
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 17:53 +0000, Andy Davidson wrote: > > > On 11 Feb 2015, at 13:46, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > > > > A proposed change to RIPE Document "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment > > Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region" is now available for discussion. > > Thanks for your sharing policy proposal idea but I think the > deckchairs would look better on the other side of this mighty > unsinkable ship. I therefore can’t support this proposal. > > Andy I also oppose this proposal. I believe the best thing that can happen is for IPv4 to run out completely, as fast as possible. Increasing the RIPE NCC IPv4 price is counter-productive to that goal. Real market prices will arrive when this happens. I'm generally in favour of any proposal that hastens the run-out of the final /8. /M
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]