[address-policy-wg] An interesting policy question

Hi Sander:

Thanks for the reply and the discussion was started in one of the RIR
meetings, and I am just asking community view(not official in any way of
course) of this as part of globe view on the *need*, as it is an shared
concept for every RIR.

I think I have the answer I wanted here now and I appreciate everyone's
input, if any future contribution or disagreement I still welcome of
course, if you afraid generate noise in the list you are welcome to email
me personally.

But one thing I do hope is, don't let people afraid generate noise here in
the list, let people ask dum question here, I come across quite few young
people that really afraid to say anything in this list, just because they
afraid to make mistake...this really isn't the case I hope.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote:

> Hi Lu,
>
> > Thanks Vladislav for the clear answer.
> >
> > And for the list, this is an answer I would like to receive, clear and
> easy.
> >
> > The example was very simple so I was expecting an simple answer as well.
>
> Glad you are happy with that answer. I just want to state for the record
> that any answer on this topic given on this mailing list does not represent
> any official interpretation of the policy and is as such non-authoritative
> :)  Official interpretations are only given in the Impact Analysis of a
> policy proposal.
>
> > (I got an feeling that anything I say in the list was wrong, I hope it
> does not become personal again, I am asking a policy question in a policy
> discussion mailing list and nothing more than that).
>
> Nothing personal, and both Gert and I have answered your question as well
> as we could. Things are more complex than this answer shows though. For
> example changing the geographical location by itself might not make the
> 'need' invalid, but any changes in who/what the addresses are connected to
> might etc. These things are determined on a case-by-case basis by the
> hostmasters/IPRAs.
>
> That is why we don't discuss specific cases on the mailing list. A mailing
> list never has the full data, and speculating what hostmasters would decide
> would undermine their work. We have an arbitration system for cases where
> people disagree.
>
> Cheers,
> Sander
>
>


-- 
--
Kind regards.
Lu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151204/5c75c0be/attachment.html>