[address-policy-wg] An interesting policy question

Hi

Thanks Vladislav for the clear answer.

And for the list, this is an answer I would like to receive, clear and easy.

The example was very simple so I was expecting an simple answer as well.

(I got an feeling that anything I say in the list was wrong, I hope it does
not become personal again, I am asking a policy question in a policy
discussion mailing list and nothing more than that).

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:10 AM, <poty at iiat.ru> wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> To answer your question you can look at the obsoleted forms used for
> “registering” an assignment. There was no particular points to geographic
> locations of a network, so relocation the untouched set of assets to
> another place (or even changing them in the margins of the initial request)
> did not require a new request/notification. It was the answer to the first
> question.
>
> The second question is more complex. But it seems removing one of the
> locations did not change *the need* for the assigned /24, so the answer
> to the question should be the same as the previous one.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Vladislav Potapov
>
> Ru.iiat
>
>
>
> *From:* address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Lu Heng
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 3, 2015 2:27 PM
> *To:* address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> *Subject:* [address-policy-wg] An interesting policy question
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> I have an policy question regarding Ripe policy before adoption of "no
> need" policy.
>
>
>
> We all know that before the no need policy, when Ripe makes an assignment,
> while the "need" has changed, the assignment become invalid.
>
>
>
> The question come to what the definition of need. Below I have few
> examples, please provide your view:
>
>
>
> First one:
>
>
>
> Company A provides 100 customer dedicated server service at location A,
> Ripe makes an assignment for 100 IP for his infrastructure, if, under
> condition that no other factor was changed, Company A moved his
> infrastructure to location B, but still providing same service to same
> customer, does the company's action need to be notified  to RIR? And does
> this action considered invalid the original assignment?
>
>
>
> Second one:
>
>
>
> Company A provides web hosting service, but any casted in 3 location, and
> has provided the evidence of 3 location to the RIR during the time the
> company getting valid assignment, then A decided to cut 3 location to 2
> location, does this invalid original assignment and need to be notified to
> RIR?
>
>
>
> So the bottom line is, what is the definition of need, is it defined as
> the service you are providing or defined as whole package of any of
> original justification material was provided, if was the later, then does
> it imply that anything, including location of the infrastructure, upstream
> providers etc has changed due to operational need, it will be considered as
> change of purpose of use and need to be notified to RIR?
>
>
>
> What should be the right interpretation of the policy by then?
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Kind regards.
> Lu
>



-- 
--
Kind regards.
Lu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151204/23535547/attachment.html>