[address-policy-wg] An interesting policy question

On 03/12/2015 19:56, Lu Heng wrote:
> I am asking a very specific question to an very specific service example
> here, the only way to be more specific would be naming people. 

you're asking a vague question with very few details and expecting a very
specific answer.

> the only way to be more specific would be naming people. 

which makes this sound like your email is the subject of an open issue with
the RIPE NCC.

If this is the case, it would probably be inappropriate to discuss the
matter on AP-WG because this mailing list doesn't have the full facts
available, nor does it have any mandate to discuss issues which are being
handled by the RIPE NCC.  In other words, this is the RIPE NCC's business.

If you feel that there is a problem with how the RIPE NCC is handling an
case, there is a Conflict Arbitration Procedure which allows an independent
Arbiters Panel to review any decision that the RIPE NCC has made.

Nick