This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Fri Aug 28 15:13:46 CEST 2015
On 28/08/2015 12:28, SBS - Support wrote: > The RIPE policy of allocating only a PA /22 to new LIR's and not allocating > any further IPv4 resources is highly detrimental to the growth of new > upcoming organisations and protects legacy Telco operators, what are your > thoughts on reviewing this and coming up with a process to allocate further > resources to new LIR's if the need can be justified. Anyone is free to suggest a better mechanism. If you have some ideas which are better that what's already there, please feel free to write a proposal. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]