This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ripe at europeiptv.net
ripe at europeiptv.net
Sat Aug 15 09:57:20 CEST 2015
Hello, The proposal is that once an LIR has received one /22 from 185/8, LIRs are eligible to apply for another /22, and that the blocks ranges are used that IANA has redistributed so far today is: 45.128.0.0 - 45.159.255.255 45.8.0.0 - 45.15.255.255 45.80.0.0 - 45.95.255.255 and that these allocations are governed by the policy 2015-01 as well. You know what I mean? ( I'm sorry for my English ). Regards. IPTV Europe El 2015-08-14 13:47, Carsten Schiefner escribió: > Dear David, > > On 14.08.2015 09:09, ripe at europeiptv.net wrote: >> Hello, I wonder what you think the community ripe to propose a new >> policy for IPv4 addressing, the proposal would be something like >> having >> another RIR as APNIC. >> >> >> We all know that RIPE currently has in place the policy for the last >> /8, >> the proposal is correct but, because it does not make eligible LIRs >> for >> another /22? >> >> The new /22 It would address that IANA has redistributed to RIPE. >> >> 45.128.0.0 - 45.159.255.255 >> 45.8.0.0 - 45.15.255.255 >> 45.80.0.0 - 45.95.255.255 >> >> and 2015-01 policy active, no transfer for next 24 months after >> allocation, and it is found necessary to use this new allocation, so >> it >> would prevent requested to speculate. >> >> I hope your views regarding this > > even after having re-read this a couple of times I have not the > slightest clue what you are aiming at. > > I am sorry. > > Best, > > -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]