This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Thu Aug 13 12:04:57 CEST 2015
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Wilfried Woeber wrote: > For that reason I am *against* "promoting" the use of IRC as a WG-affiliated > or endorsed tool. I totally agree, I have no problem with having inofficial place for people to discuss, but the official place (the one that counts) is this mailing list. I have had really bad experience when having multiple official channels, it's never worked out in my experience. So I will join an IRC channel if one is created, but let's make sure everybody understands that it's an inofficial communications channel and if you come to any conclusions and want them to officially be part of the official discussion, they need to be brought to the mailing list. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]