This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT)
d.baeza at tvt-datos.es
Wed Aug 12 17:12:56 CEST 2015
El 12/08/2015 a las 17:06, Janos Zsako escribió: > > I am afraid I do not understand what you mean by "official noise". > > I think Jim's approach that "if a discussion about any WG matter does not > take place on the mailing list, it simply didn't happen" is the correct one. > > Therefore, everybody is free to chat on IRC, but even if the number of > participants is very high, all that is said there is "unofficial", as long > as the ideas are not presented on the list as well. I have no objection to > the setting up IRC if the above is accepted and respected by all participants. > > Best regards, > Janos > Hi Janos, I will say it again, IRC is not replacing the list. IRC is complementing it. With official, I mean something like "RIPE Seal of Approval". In IRC PDP will not happens, but *can be* a good place to cook ideas. It will be as official as we want it to be, but again, it will never replace the Mailing List.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]